Speedline question.

Anything about BXs
User avatar
mat_fenwick
Moderator
Posts: 7328
Joined: Tue Sep 20, 2005 4:08 pm
Location: North Wales
x 20

Post by mat_fenwick »

DavidRutherford wrote:Fit smaller wheels with high-profile tyres, and you have a soft ride again.
And also better looks, or am I the only one to think huge wheels with a tiny strip of tyre round the outside just look plain wrong?
Image

1993 1.9 TZD Turbo Estate
1996 3.9 V8 Discovery
1993 VW LT35 campervan
1985 Hyundai Stellar V8
2016 Hyundai iLoad
User avatar
Philip Chidlow
Over 2k
Posts: 11594
Joined: Fri Oct 07, 2005 1:08 pm
Location: Chelmsford, Essex
x 25

Post by Philip Chidlow »

mat_fenwick wrote:
DavidRutherford wrote:Fit smaller wheels with high-profile tyres, and you have a soft ride again.
And also better looks, or am I the only one to think huge wheels with a tiny strip of tyre round the outside just look plain wrong?
Not at all, Mat. I like to see a tyre! For that reason I have a reluctant fondness for some SUV's. Although that fondness ends at the wheels I guess. But when you see a Range Rover Spurt with rubber bands around 20"+ rims that is absolutely stupid!
• 1992 Citroen BX TZD Turbo Hurricane
• 2006 Xsara Picasso 1.6 16v
Defender110
Over 2k
Posts: 5918
Joined: Wed Dec 16, 2009 8:02 pm
Location: Harwood, Bolton
My Cars: Land Rover Discovery Series 1 200tdi 3 door
Land Rover Discovery Series 2 Facelift TD5
2020 Fiat Panda cross 4x4 twin air.
x 27

Post by Defender110 »

DavidRutherford wrote:
Defender110 wrote: As above from pg. 1 ; the wider 195's have ruined the ride quality. I'm trying to get back as close to the original 165's whilst keeping the Graphite Speedlines which realy do suit the car.
It's not the width that ruins the ride quality, it's the sidewall height. 165/70's have a sidewall height of 116mm, whereas 195/55's have a sidewall height of 107. Not a massive difference, but enough that there is a lot less flex in them, and so you get more high frequencies transmitted.
Yes I understand it is the sidewall height that affects the ride but it is th width that creates the extra road noise which is why I have gone for the 175/65 to take the sidewall height back up to 114 whilst reducing the road noise. It is the closest I can get back to the original steel fitment whilst keeping the speedlines.
I hadn't considered 185/65 because it was never a Citroen fitment option and although the comfort of the 120mm sidewall sounds appealing I would then need to alter the speedo drive to suit wouldn't I?
Kevan
1997 Mercedes C230 W202
2003 Land Rover Discovery Series 2 Facelift TD5 - Daily driver / hobby days and camping.
1993 Land Rover Discovery 200tdi Series 1 3 door - in need of TLC
2020 Fiat Panda 4x4 Cross Twin Air.
User avatar
DavidRutherford
BX Digit man!
Posts: 2706
Joined: Wed May 18, 2005 5:07 pm
Location: Placing comments on YouTube.

Post by DavidRutherford »

Defender110 wrote:I would then need to alter the speedo drive to suit wouldn't I?
Not really.. the rolling difference is barely a few percent out and is not noticeable. In many cases you're simply fixing the error that is already there.
this might be a signature
Defender110
Over 2k
Posts: 5918
Joined: Wed Dec 16, 2009 8:02 pm
Location: Harwood, Bolton
My Cars: Land Rover Discovery Series 1 200tdi 3 door
Land Rover Discovery Series 2 Facelift TD5
2020 Fiat Panda cross 4x4 twin air.
x 27

Post by Defender110 »

Had the new 175/65 tyres fitted today the latest Mitchelin Energy 'Green' and wow I can't believe the difference. It has never driven so well, very happy they look spot on too \:D/
I really liked Davids idea of the 185/65 for the 120mm side wall hieght and would of liked to have tried that but had already ordered the tyres.
Kevan
1997 Mercedes C230 W202
2003 Land Rover Discovery Series 2 Facelift TD5 - Daily driver / hobby days and camping.
1993 Land Rover Discovery 200tdi Series 1 3 door - in need of TLC
2020 Fiat Panda 4x4 Cross Twin Air.