Bad fuel economy
- Philip Chidlow
- Over 2k
- Posts: 11594
- Joined: Fri Oct 07, 2005 1:08 pm
- Location: Chelmsford, Essex
- x 25
- saintjamesy89
- Over 2k
- Posts: 2000
- Joined: Tue May 04, 2010 8:01 pm
- Location: Somerset
- My Cars: 1985 Citroen BX19 GT
198x Citroen BX16 TRS auto
1988 Volvo 740 2.0 GL Hearse
1991 Saab 900 16v convertible
2007 Lexus RX 400h SE - x 127
Cool at least that part is done ok.
Somewhere in the darkest recess of this forums electronic memory is a chart of the official fuel consumption figures.
Something about the fuel figures I got on my own 19s compared to the official figures made me consider the enviroental factors in why they were not near those figures.
During the Brazilian F1 qualifying Martin Brundle mentioned about the altitude at the event reducing power by 10%, this made me start thing because that was just 800m above sea level and the majority of my driving is done between 400-900m even though open road speed (100kph) 62 mph the fuel efficany is way off but once I take 10% into account the figures becomes clearer.
Ok I bet no one in the UK can test that theory for me
Somewhere in the darkest recess of this forums electronic memory is a chart of the official fuel consumption figures.
Something about the fuel figures I got on my own 19s compared to the official figures made me consider the enviroental factors in why they were not near those figures.
During the Brazilian F1 qualifying Martin Brundle mentioned about the altitude at the event reducing power by 10%, this made me start thing because that was just 800m above sea level and the majority of my driving is done between 400-900m even though open road speed (100kph) 62 mph the fuel efficany is way off but once I take 10% into account the figures becomes clearer.
Ok I bet no one in the UK can test that theory for me
Yes it is easier to install on a carb engine, but your most likely to be using, an open loop system = crude system.LPG on a Carb engine is actually a lot easier than on an injection engine, and if set up properly is safer than petrol.
It works and is reliable, but is not without its problems:
Poor fuel economy compared to more advanced LPG systems.
Loss of power, due to the mixer ring orifice size always being a compromise between being small enough diameter on tickover to suck the required amount of LPG into the engine, and large enough diameter on full throttle openings to get sufficient air into the engine, consequently the engine can feel lumpy or even stall on tickover, and strangled at the top of the rev range due to this restriction.
The float chamber will have to empty before changing to LPG, and consequently refill before starting again on petrol (so expect some serious cranking over upon starting on Petrol a car with a mechanical fuel pump), hence the need for three position changeover switches on open loop systems.
When running on LPG or changing to it, the petrol supply is interupted by a 12V solenoid placed in the fuel line, which is not good for mechanical fuel pumps as it is then pumping against a 'dead head'
In my opinion if your going to LPG a carb engine consider using a BLOS mixer (variable oriface gas carburetor similar to SU carb in operation), and replace the mechanical lift pump with an electronic version that can easily be switched off via a relay.
Far better to convert an injection engine to LPG, be it closed loop Lambda system or a sequential LPG conversion, for better fuel economy, and driving experience.
The only disadvantage is a more complex system ie injector emulators required, a lambda sensor required (however this can easily be intalled in the down pipe just for the LPG system)
A good compromise would be a closed loop lambda system operating in conjunction with a BLOS mixer and petrol injector emulators, fitted onto an injected engine.
Yes it is, but again not without problems:LPG is an excellent fuel for an internal combustion engine really. Burns lovely and cleanly, meaning you have very little engine damage, oil comes out clean.
As LPG has the lubricating properties of a dry fart, valve seat reccession can be a serious problem. Honda and some Ford engines are notoroius for it, and this can only be overcome by using flashlube which constantly measures a metered qty of upper cylinder lubricant into the inlet manifold.
-
- Over 2k
- Posts: 5917
- Joined: Wed Dec 16, 2009 8:02 pm
- Location: Harwood, Bolton
- My Cars: Land Rover Discovery Series 1 200tdi 3 door
Land Rover Discovery Series 2 Facelift TD5
2020 Fiat Panda cross 4x4 twin air. - x 27
I use this very handy little calculator from another forum althought this states 4.561 ltrs per gallon. Perhaps we could have our own Citroen BX version?kiwi wrote: A classic mistake often made it seems more and more each day is the calculation to miles per gallon
You buy your fuel in Litres then convert it to gallons what figure you use can affect that number. How many litres do you think a Gallon is?
http://www.mdocuk.co.uk/mpg_calculator.htm
Kevan
1997 Mercedes C230 W202
2003 Land Rover Discovery Series 2 Facelift TD5 - Daily driver / hobby days and camping.
1993 Land Rover Discovery 200tdi Series 1 3 door - in need of TLC
2020 Fiat Panda 4x4 Cross Twin Air.
1997 Mercedes C230 W202
2003 Land Rover Discovery Series 2 Facelift TD5 - Daily driver / hobby days and camping.
1993 Land Rover Discovery 200tdi Series 1 3 door - in need of TLC
2020 Fiat Panda 4x4 Cross Twin Air.
-
- Over 2k
- Posts: 5917
- Joined: Wed Dec 16, 2009 8:02 pm
- Location: Harwood, Bolton
- My Cars: Land Rover Discovery Series 1 200tdi 3 door
Land Rover Discovery Series 2 Facelift TD5
2020 Fiat Panda cross 4x4 twin air. - x 27
There is also this problem of US gallons and UK Imperial gallons getting mixed up.
1 US gallon = 0.83267384 Imperial gallons
1 US gallon = 0.83267384 Imperial gallons
Kevan
1997 Mercedes C230 W202
2003 Land Rover Discovery Series 2 Facelift TD5 - Daily driver / hobby days and camping.
1993 Land Rover Discovery 200tdi Series 1 3 door - in need of TLC
2020 Fiat Panda 4x4 Cross Twin Air.
1997 Mercedes C230 W202
2003 Land Rover Discovery Series 2 Facelift TD5 - Daily driver / hobby days and camping.
1993 Land Rover Discovery 200tdi Series 1 3 door - in need of TLC
2020 Fiat Panda 4x4 Cross Twin Air.
-
- Over 2k
- Posts: 5917
- Joined: Wed Dec 16, 2009 8:02 pm
- Location: Harwood, Bolton
- My Cars: Land Rover Discovery Series 1 200tdi 3 door
Land Rover Discovery Series 2 Facelift TD5
2020 Fiat Panda cross 4x4 twin air. - x 27
i find myself working the old 9 x table and working iin multiples of 9litres (2 gallons) - so 33litres = 3 lots of 9 plus a bit leftover(6litres). so makes about 7 1/3 gallons. I've never considered it before, but Miles per litre might be interesting i.e. 45mpg = 10mpl I can't get used to litres per 100km.
Same here I used to do the Miles Per Litre in the UK could never be bothered to fluff around on converting to gallons or the other formula of litres per 100kmsdelasal wrote: I've never considered it before, but Miles per litre might be interesting i.e. 45mpg = 10mpl I can't get used to litres per 100km.
Even now I use Kms per litre and not the litres per 100kms. Such an easy calculation to just grab distance divided by quantity.