THE_Liam wrote:Kitch wrote:THE_Liam wrote:How short is the gearing? What kind of revs at 70? It'll be mostly town driving though...
Not sure, mine used to pull around 3:45pm at 70mph
VTS conversion is do-able, but pointless. An XU9J4 (16v engine) fits a BX, because they came with them. It's a better engine too.
If you're going to tune a TU in it, go for a VTR block, an AX GTi/106 XSi/106 Rallye head and some bike carbs. Then get a Megajolt box to run the coil pack and go distributorless ignition. Bash a decent cam and 4-branch in it and you're knocking on the door of 120bhp. Same as VTS, but less pointless as you've stuck with 8v out of principle
I would like to see a VTS lump in a BX. It'd certainly be a tidy-looking engine bay, but if you declare it (which in fairness you won't get away with not doing should you have a punt) you're looking at a whacking premium (more than a 16v, which will still be quicker) and you lose the cheap-tax bracket.
The only thing about going from TU - XU is in my experience of PSA cars you have to change the subframe and shafts, plus to be honest I've always rated the TU petrols higher than the XU petrols. My 306 S16 did 25mpg everywhere, and my 106 GTI did high 30's and was almost as quick. The XU 16v really drinks for a 2 litre in my opinion...
As for the declaring stuff, I declare all my mods down to stickers and my insurance is always pretty reasonable despite living in a really bad area for car crime and being 25. I'm not really bothered about the tax thing either because it's only £100 a year difference or something like that...
I might give it a go. I have the engine in the shed anyway
Cheers for all the replies by the way
You may well have to faff around with subframes etc, and in the shopping applications the TU is better than the XU. But for going quickly, the XU is superior IMO. VTS lump has a pretty restrictive head design, and aside from looking neat under the bonnet it's pretty characterless. The XU9J4 is a bllodhound compared with the TU5J4 (that's not knocking the TU5J4, it's just that it's not in the same league of fun.....I own both!)
TU is good on fuel, agreed, although the 2.0 16v XU's have always been decent too in my experience. The ZX 16v I had (same engine as S16) was brilliant on fuel....just slow. The 106 GTi GTi will always be better on fuel because it's lighter, and I'm guessing more aerodynamic.
Declaring stuff.....I used to go by the book, but the older I grow the less I give a fuck! I've been there and seen what happens with undeclared engines etc. The reality is that most of the time the policyholder gets away with it. Not saying it's right, or moral etc. But you don't get thanked or given a discount for being honest - you just continue to get legally robbed each year!
Just my view though, not saying it's right....