MK 1 front sphere part number
MK 1 front sphere part number
Sorry if this has been previously covered, but can someone please point me to a resource that will tell me the correct part number for a front sphere for a Mk1 GT.. They are still the larger size but are stamped with 55 and not 70.
So from what I understand this makes these spheres have the same overall travel as the standard larger sphere (non GT-Mk1...stamped/pressurised with 70), but are firmer through out this range of travel
I want to get this right because I need to replace a sphere that was kindly offered to me at an 11th hour on a weekend...
Also, am I correct in guessing that a 55 can be charged up to 70 if required??
Thanks guys/gals
Ash
So from what I understand this makes these spheres have the same overall travel as the standard larger sphere (non GT-Mk1...stamped/pressurised with 70), but are firmer through out this range of travel
I want to get this right because I need to replace a sphere that was kindly offered to me at an 11th hour on a weekend...
Also, am I correct in guessing that a 55 can be charged up to 70 if required??
Thanks guys/gals
Ash
Current
85 BX GT Mk1..
86 BX TRS Mk1
87 BX TRi
Gone
85 BX TRS mk1 auto... SOLD
90 BX TRi..parts....cubed
85 BX GT Mk1..
86 BX TRS Mk1
87 BX TRi
Gone
85 BX TRS mk1 auto... SOLD
90 BX TRi..parts....cubed
Re: MK 1 front sphere part number
Bump!!!!
Current
85 BX GT Mk1..
86 BX TRS Mk1
87 BX TRi
Gone
85 BX TRS mk1 auto... SOLD
90 BX TRi..parts....cubed
85 BX GT Mk1..
86 BX TRS Mk1
87 BX TRi
Gone
85 BX TRS mk1 auto... SOLD
90 BX TRi..parts....cubed
Re: MK 1 front sphere part number
I'm not sure why you want to charge to 70 but the following is a good authoritative source of info:
http://citroen.tramontana.co.hu/suspens ... nt-spheres" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;
http://citroen.tramontana.co.hu/suspens ... nt-spheres" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;
1991 BX19GTi Auto
- MULLEY
- Over 2k
- Posts: 8406
- Joined: Thu Jun 22, 2006 11:10 pm
- Location: Derbyshire
- My Cars: 1999 Xsara LX 2.0HDI (90) Hatch - Fern
2002 C5 2.0 HDI (110) Estate - Jasmine - SORN
2011 Mini Cooper D Clubman - SOLD
2016 Mercedes A180D Sport - Auto refinement
1992 TZD Turbo - Bluebell - SORN
1992 TZD Turbo Estate - SORN
1991 Gti 16V - Blaze - crash damaged, will get repaired - SORN
1990 Gti 8Valve SOLD - looks like it's been scrapped
2002 Mini Cooper S - SOLD - i miss this car
1992 TXD - Scrapped in March 2014
1988 CX 25 GTI Turbo2 - SORN
1996 - AX Memphis 1.5D - Dream - SORN - x 8
Re: MK 1 front sphere part number
Contact Westroen, they may be able to advise on pressures etc...& may even have some in stock.
2002 C5 2.0 HDI Estate - Jasmine - Now SORN
2011 Mini Cooper D Clubman - SOLD
2016 Mercedes A180D Sport - Auto refinement
1992 TZD Turbo - Bluebell - My daily
1991 Gti 16V - Blaze - crash damaged, will get repaired.
1990 Gti 8Valve SOLD - looks like it's been scrapped
2002 Mini Cooper S - SOLD - i miss this car
1992 TXD - Scrapped in March 2014
1988 CX 25 GTI Turbo2 - SORN
1996 - AX Memphis 1.5D - Dream - SORN
I'm not just a username, i'm also called Matthew.
2011 Mini Cooper D Clubman - SOLD
2016 Mercedes A180D Sport - Auto refinement
1992 TZD Turbo - Bluebell - My daily
1991 Gti 16V - Blaze - crash damaged, will get repaired.
1990 Gti 8Valve SOLD - looks like it's been scrapped
2002 Mini Cooper S - SOLD - i miss this car
1992 TXD - Scrapped in March 2014
1988 CX 25 GTI Turbo2 - SORN
1996 - AX Memphis 1.5D - Dream - SORN
I'm not just a username, i'm also called Matthew.
Re: MK 1 front sphere part number
Are you on commission from Westroen, Mulley?MULLEY wrote:Contact Westroen, they may be able to advise on pressures etc...& may even have some in stock.
There is still the question here as to why a non-standard pressure of 70 would be desired. I use the standard volume, pressure & damping types for the GTi which gives a nice firm ride. 70 seems way OTT to me.
1991 BX19GTi Auto
- MULLEY
- Over 2k
- Posts: 8406
- Joined: Thu Jun 22, 2006 11:10 pm
- Location: Derbyshire
- My Cars: 1999 Xsara LX 2.0HDI (90) Hatch - Fern
2002 C5 2.0 HDI (110) Estate - Jasmine - SORN
2011 Mini Cooper D Clubman - SOLD
2016 Mercedes A180D Sport - Auto refinement
1992 TZD Turbo - Bluebell - SORN
1992 TZD Turbo Estate - SORN
1991 Gti 16V - Blaze - crash damaged, will get repaired - SORN
1990 Gti 8Valve SOLD - looks like it's been scrapped
2002 Mini Cooper S - SOLD - i miss this car
1992 TXD - Scrapped in March 2014
1988 CX 25 GTI Turbo2 - SORN
1996 - AX Memphis 1.5D - Dream - SORN - x 8
Re: MK 1 front sphere part number
If only, haha. I suppose an advantage of having a higher pressure is that the sphere will last longer? No idea what it would do to ride etc though....
2002 C5 2.0 HDI Estate - Jasmine - Now SORN
2011 Mini Cooper D Clubman - SOLD
2016 Mercedes A180D Sport - Auto refinement
1992 TZD Turbo - Bluebell - My daily
1991 Gti 16V - Blaze - crash damaged, will get repaired.
1990 Gti 8Valve SOLD - looks like it's been scrapped
2002 Mini Cooper S - SOLD - i miss this car
1992 TXD - Scrapped in March 2014
1988 CX 25 GTI Turbo2 - SORN
1996 - AX Memphis 1.5D - Dream - SORN
I'm not just a username, i'm also called Matthew.
2011 Mini Cooper D Clubman - SOLD
2016 Mercedes A180D Sport - Auto refinement
1992 TZD Turbo - Bluebell - My daily
1991 Gti 16V - Blaze - crash damaged, will get repaired.
1990 Gti 8Valve SOLD - looks like it's been scrapped
2002 Mini Cooper S - SOLD - i miss this car
1992 TXD - Scrapped in March 2014
1988 CX 25 GTI Turbo2 - SORN
1996 - AX Memphis 1.5D - Dream - SORN
I'm not just a username, i'm also called Matthew.
Re: MK 1 front sphere part number
A higher sphere pressure results in a softer ride. It seems counter intuitive at first until you remember that a "flat" sphere, with little or no pressure, is rock hard. The "performance" BX had reduced pressure to firm up the suspension.
Damping on the other hand is a function of the valve installed in the neck of the sphere
Damping on the other hand is a function of the valve installed in the neck of the sphere
Michael, Sydney, Australia
BX19TRI Automatic
DS23 Pallas
BX19TRI Automatic
DS23 Pallas
Re: MK 1 front sphere part number
Thanks for the info guys
AFAIK 70 is standard pressure for a standard MK1 (large sphere) especially as 70 stamped into the side.. This is a reason why the Mk1's ride better..
And as said the GT has same larger spheres but stamped 50 ,,so yes firmer but same wheel travel as normal MK1s..
AFAIK 70 is standard pressure for a standard MK1 (large sphere) especially as 70 stamped into the side.. This is a reason why the Mk1's ride better..
And as said the GT has same larger spheres but stamped 50 ,,so yes firmer but same wheel travel as normal MK1s..
Current
85 BX GT Mk1..
86 BX TRS Mk1
87 BX TRi
Gone
85 BX TRS mk1 auto... SOLD
90 BX TRi..parts....cubed
85 BX GT Mk1..
86 BX TRS Mk1
87 BX TRi
Gone
85 BX TRS mk1 auto... SOLD
90 BX TRi..parts....cubed
- saintjamesy89
- Over 2k
- Posts: 2000
- Joined: Tue May 04, 2010 8:01 pm
- Location: Somerset
- My Cars: 1985 Citroen BX19 GT
198x Citroen BX16 TRS auto
1988 Volvo 740 2.0 GL Hearse
1991 Saab 900 16v convertible
2007 Lexus RX 400h SE - x 127
Re: MK 1 front sphere part number
I disagree, I did a lot of figuring and searching about spheres last night and the highest pressure BX sphere was 55 bar, see this table for spheres fitted to BX's. If you want a nice soft ride, then go for 500 ccm, 55 bar front spheres with a center bore of 1.8mm. For the rears go for 400ccm, 40 bar and 1.1mm bore - but apparently this drilled out to 1.2mm does improve the rear. I think you'll find that the larger cits were fitted with 70 bar and above, as these run higher pressure hydraulic systems and are heavier, so need the higher sphere pressure.
On one source (can't find it again now...), a chap pressured his spheres to 65 bar and this was getting close to the hydraulic operating pressure (65 bar is the sphere pressure when there is no LHM in the sphere, when car is running and on normal ride height, the nitrogen pressure roughly doubles as LHM is forced into the sphere to make the car rise to normal height) so when the chap did the bounce test on the front of the car, it dipped nice and softly, then rebounded and froze somewhere between intermediate and high height, as the sphere pressure was nearly equal to the LHM pressure, equilibrium was reached at the wrong height, so the front end didn't return to normal height.
Now 60 bar, this has been done and done successfully. But you do need to do it with 500ccm spheres apparently. This is what I plan to do with my fronts
To answer another of your questions, you can get a sphere re-gassed to above it's standard pressure, but I don't know if it'll keep this pressure for as long as the original - depends on the condition of the diaphragm. With the MK1 ride being more comfy, this I believe is due to roller bearings being used on the suspension rather than rubber bushes, more than this I can't tell you - because I don't know!
On one source (can't find it again now...), a chap pressured his spheres to 65 bar and this was getting close to the hydraulic operating pressure (65 bar is the sphere pressure when there is no LHM in the sphere, when car is running and on normal ride height, the nitrogen pressure roughly doubles as LHM is forced into the sphere to make the car rise to normal height) so when the chap did the bounce test on the front of the car, it dipped nice and softly, then rebounded and froze somewhere between intermediate and high height, as the sphere pressure was nearly equal to the LHM pressure, equilibrium was reached at the wrong height, so the front end didn't return to normal height.
Now 60 bar, this has been done and done successfully. But you do need to do it with 500ccm spheres apparently. This is what I plan to do with my fronts
To answer another of your questions, you can get a sphere re-gassed to above it's standard pressure, but I don't know if it'll keep this pressure for as long as the original - depends on the condition of the diaphragm. With the MK1 ride being more comfy, this I believe is due to roller bearings being used on the suspension rather than rubber bushes, more than this I can't tell you - because I don't know!
I'm not a Saint, or a James, but a Tom Saint-James!
Mes voitures:
1985 Citroen BX19 GT
1988 Volvo 740 2.0 GL Hearse
2006 Lexus RX 400h SE hybrid
Mes voitures:
1985 Citroen BX19 GT
1988 Volvo 740 2.0 GL Hearse
2006 Lexus RX 400h SE hybrid
Re: MK 1 front sphere part number
HHMMMmmm... the thot plickens
Current
85 BX GT Mk1..
86 BX TRS Mk1
87 BX TRi
Gone
85 BX TRS mk1 auto... SOLD
90 BX TRi..parts....cubed
85 BX GT Mk1..
86 BX TRS Mk1
87 BX TRi
Gone
85 BX TRS mk1 auto... SOLD
90 BX TRi..parts....cubed
Re: MK 1 front sphere part number
This explanation makes no sense. You cannot use a failed state to justify a hypothesis.michaelr wrote:A higher sphere pressure results in a softer ride. It seems counter intuitive at first until you remember that a "flat" sphere, with little or no pressure, is rock hard. The "performance" BX had reduced pressure to firm up the suspension.
You need to view it from when in equilibrium with the engine running and with the pump already maintaining LHM in the sphere. Say that now the diaphragm is approximately at the midway point in the sphere and you drive over a bump. The diaphragm will deflect a certain distance as the LHM compresses the Nitrogen. If the sphere pressure is higher then it becomes harder to compress the Nitrogen so the deflection will be less for that same bump (firmer suspension!).
Reducing the pressure will result in a softer ride but only to the point where Nitrogen still separates the diaphragm from the sphere wall when going over a bump. Beyond this point there is no longer a pneumatic "cushion" and "crashiness will result over the larger bumps and potholes.
1991 BX19GTi Auto
Re: MK 1 front sphere part number
You are incorrect I am afraid, though I fully understand how you came to that conclusion. I was wrong though to mention a completely "flat" sphere. However, if what you suggest was true all our suspension spheres would be getting softer and softer as they lose gas.... and then suddenly become rock hard when it is all gone. As you know, that is not true.Way2go wrote:
This explanation makes no sense. You cannot use a failed state to justify a hypothesis.
The actual internal pressure of a sphere whilst supporting the car is a function of the weight it supports. The height corrector continues to supply fluid to the cylinder and sphere until it balances the load. The initial pressure of the gas in the sphere does not affect this, except is extreme cases.
Higher gas pressure however does mean that less fluid enters the system to achieve that balance and so the volume of gas is greater. A bigger volume of gas equates to softer "springs" as there is more of it to compress.
In the 16V BX Citroen specified lower gas pressures (45 bar as opposed to the standard 55 bar) which equate to a stiffer spring. They also fitted increasingly small damper orifices as the performance increased for "stiffer shocks".
Higher gas pressures (within reason) result in a softer ride.
Michael, Sydney, Australia
BX19TRI Automatic
DS23 Pallas
BX19TRI Automatic
DS23 Pallas
- barry badger
- BXpert
- Posts: 341
- Joined: Sun Feb 12, 2012 10:17 am
- Location: north west.
- x 7
Re: MK 1 front sphere part number
If a higher sphere pressure = softer ride and mk1 bxs were rated at 70bar, is this the reason for the fabled mk1 ride?
1993 tzd estate, on sorn
1992 tzd estate, slowly being raided for parts
1992 txd estate, "doom blue" on the road
1991 4x4 estate, on sorn
1992 tzd estate, slowly being raided for parts
1992 txd estate, "doom blue" on the road
1991 4x4 estate, on sorn
- saintjamesy89
- Over 2k
- Posts: 2000
- Joined: Tue May 04, 2010 8:01 pm
- Location: Somerset
- My Cars: 1985 Citroen BX19 GT
198x Citroen BX16 TRS auto
1988 Volvo 740 2.0 GL Hearse
1991 Saab 900 16v convertible
2007 Lexus RX 400h SE - x 127
Re: MK 1 front sphere part number
I have always thought the early MK1's were so nice to ride in because of a different bush/bearing set up - the mystic roller bearings rather than rubber bushes in the wishbones. In y research, the highest pressure sphere I have come across in a BX is 55 bar. Not that my lookings are exhaustive, but given the BX LHM operating pressure (150 bar I think, do correct me if i'm wrong), 70 bar spheres would be very very close to this when there is LHM in the sphere (about 140 bar) giving the system a very hard time to raise the car up from it's bump stops, and to function as it does generally.barry badger wrote:If a higher sphere pressure = softer ride and mk1 bxs were rated at 70bar, is this the reason for the fabled mk1 ride?
I'm not a Saint, or a James, but a Tom Saint-James!
Mes voitures:
1985 Citroen BX19 GT
1988 Volvo 740 2.0 GL Hearse
2006 Lexus RX 400h SE hybrid
Mes voitures:
1985 Citroen BX19 GT
1988 Volvo 740 2.0 GL Hearse
2006 Lexus RX 400h SE hybrid
Re: MK 1 front sphere part number
Actually, the system will raise the suspension up to normal height (or as set) whatever the pressure in the sphere or even with failed spheres as this is function of the height corrector, The height corrector gets it's information from the attitude of the anti-roll bars.saintjamesy89 wrote:70 bar spheres would be very very close to this when there is LHM in the sphere (about 140 bar) giving the system a very hard time to raise the car up from it's bump stops, and to function as it does generally.
(however if you attempt to drive with failed spheres it will be jumpy as hell and you will have no springing or damping but to the eye the car will be up to it's ride height)
Likewise the sphere pressure will not alter the ride height, but only will change the ratio of LHM to Nitrogen either side of the diaphagm and the spring rate that this will cause in conjunction with the car weight.
1991 BX19GTi Auto