Nice TZD

artic-steel · Post by **artic-steel** » Wed Mar 14, 2007 7:24 pm

http://cgi.ebay.co.uk/CITROEN-BX-TZD-TU ... dZViewItem

Philip Chidlow · Post by **Philip Chidlow** » Wed Mar 14, 2007 7:58 pm

To quote:

as the advert reads the is only a couple of weeks mot ,and yes it does look nice and it drives nice ,as for whats wrong with it ,i do not sell rubbish on ebay its not worth the headache,the car is a 13 year old car and is in very good condition starts goes up no smoke and drives very well,yes if i do not sell her i will get it moted iv not taken it too a garage yet ,but iv had a quick look and one tyre looks low and the exhaust silencer has a crack in it but the car is not a pill of rubbish it is woth saving , its well worth a look cheers dave

Potential good BX for someone then...

cavmad · Post by **cavmad** » Wed Mar 14, 2007 9:12 pm

`A pill of rubbish`? What`s that about? An antidote for goodness or something?

Certainly looks like a nice car, the MOT would confirm or deny this I expect.

Mr B · Post by **Mr B** » Wed Mar 14, 2007 9:54 pm

Bit of a rare colour too

ken newbold · Post by **ken newbold** » Wed Mar 14, 2007 10:24 pm

This car was listed very recently with a hydraulic leak from the rear end. It was then removed from ebay. Presumably to fix the leak.

It is an M reg but no aircon.

No idea what the reserve is, but I was going to hire a trailer and go get this, assuming the reserve is sensible.

MULLEY · Post by **MULLEY** » Thu Mar 15, 2007 12:25 am

Go for it Ken.....

tim leech · Post by **tim leech** » Thu Mar 15, 2007 8:57 am

If its a M reg it would have been registered between August 1 1994 and July 31st 1995 only. Also I thought the only models available on a M plate were estates?

ken newbold · Post by **ken newbold** » Thu Mar 15, 2007 7:02 pm

Nah.

3 hatchbacks.

ken newbold · Post by **ken newbold** » Thu Mar 15, 2007 10:10 pm

MULLEY wrote:Go for it Ken.....

OK

cavmad · Post by **cavmad** » Fri Mar 16, 2007 6:48 am

Sorry to sound nerdy but 1993 makes it either a `K` or an `L` reg NOT an `M` reg

tim leech · Post by **tim leech** » Fri Mar 16, 2007 9:08 am

ken newbold wrote:Nah.

3 hatchbacks.

If its one of 3 then get it bought!

Barnsley BXer · Post by **Barnsley BXer** » Fri Mar 16, 2007 6:23 pm

ken newbold wrote:This car was listed very recently with a hydraulic leak from the rear end. It was then removed from ebay. Presumably to fix the leak.

It is an M reg but no aircon.

No idea what the reserve is, but I was going to hire a trailer and go get this, assuming the reserve is sensible.

What about flying down to Newquay airport and getting the seller to meet you there(assuming you win it of course)Should be cheaper

ken newbold · Post by **ken newbold** » Fri Mar 16, 2007 6:57 pm

Nope, it'll have to be trailer I'm affraid. I reckon this car's pipe work is rotten.

tim leech · Post by **tim leech** » Fri Mar 16, 2007 9:06 pm

Thought the later ones had plastic coated pipes?

Ian_Fearn · Post by **Ian_Fearn** » Fri Mar 16, 2007 9:23 pm

tim leech wrote:Thought the later ones had plastic coated pipes?

Makes no difference nowdays, they're so old now that the plastic coated pipes go rusty. Have got a shed load if you want to see how bad they can get