It’s been like this for years, but I always convinced myself it was an optical illusion, so I didn’t properly investigate. Like you, I couldn’t fathom how it could be happening, didn’t seem to make sense.
However the other day my sister was driving behind me and remarked on it, so I finally got out the tape measure and confirmed the wonk!
The last time the anti roll bar was touched it was at a famous BX specialist having the rear arms regreased. I’m sure they put everything back together correctly of course...
Perhaps the ARB is bent. It’s not making any noises so I doubt it’s flapping around unsecured.
Saggy offside rear
-
- BXpert
- Posts: 589
- Joined: Tue Aug 15, 2006 11:15 am
- Location: East London
- My Cars: 1991 Citroen BX 16v
- x 28
Re: Saggy offside rear
1991 Citroen BX 16v
-
- BXpert
- Posts: 532
- Joined: Sun Oct 27, 2013 10:54 pm
- Location: Manchester
- x 48
Re: Saggy offside rear
If it's a 16v, then I'd be inclined to think that the anti roll bar is set wrong on the rear arm(s).
The ARB has a splined fitment on the 16v's if I'm correct?, so, it just needs the clamps both aligning with each other on the rear arms and it'll sit level.
It can't be the cylinders or rods themselves as the suspension would adjust to accommodate the different lengths and thus take more oil in one cylinder & less in the other until the car sat level & height corrector turned the oil off.
It could, however, be a bent rear arm too, but I doubt it as they're thick metal and would be hard to bend.
Have a look underneath and let us know what you find.
Hope that helps.
The ARB has a splined fitment on the 16v's if I'm correct?, so, it just needs the clamps both aligning with each other on the rear arms and it'll sit level.
It can't be the cylinders or rods themselves as the suspension would adjust to accommodate the different lengths and thus take more oil in one cylinder & less in the other until the car sat level & height corrector turned the oil off.
It could, however, be a bent rear arm too, but I doubt it as they're thick metal and would be hard to bend.
Have a look underneath and let us know what you find.
Hope that helps.
1992 Citroën BX 1.9 Diesel Meteor 4x4 - The Project.
1992 Citroën BX 1.9 TXD (with GTI engine; Mulleys old car) - Parts car.
2004 Citroën Xsara Desire. (Now gone).
2016 Ford Focus Zetec - Daily Driver. (Absolute bone shaker).
1992 Citroën BX 1.9 TXD (with GTI engine; Mulleys old car) - Parts car.
2004 Citroën Xsara Desire. (Now gone).
2016 Ford Focus Zetec - Daily Driver. (Absolute bone shaker).
-
- BXpert
- Posts: 214
- Joined: Fri Aug 25, 2017 10:20 pm
- Location: Yorkshire
- My Cars: BX 16 Valve Ph 2 Current
BX 16 valve Ph 1 past
BX Gti past
BX Gti Auto past
ZX Volcane keeping others going - x 65
Re: Saggy offside rear
Yes, they do David. That's a good suggestion and could well explain the difference quoted at various heights with the change in torsion. Possibly set wrong initially or later slipped within one of the clamps.David wrote: Wed Apr 28, 2021 10:53 pm If it's a 16v, then I'd be inclined to think that the anti roll bar is set wrong on the rear arm(s).
The ARB has a splined fitment on the 16v's if I'm correct?
Prefer it to the Lamborghini, like Signor Gandini!
-
- 1K Away
- Posts: 1938
- Joined: Tue Jul 05, 2005 7:54 am
- Location: Usually in the garage
- My Cars: BX GTi, C3 Auto
- x 88
Re: Saggy offside rear
I think David has got it. The 16v A/R bar is splined so could have been misfitted or come loose at one end or the splines are fubarred. Strange thing to have happened though.
The Joy of BX with just one Citroën BX to my name now. Will I sing Bye Bye to my GTI or will it be Till death us do part.
-
- BXpert
- Posts: 681
- Joined: Sat Sep 12, 2020 4:04 pm
- Location: Sayalonga, Malaga
- My Cars: 1992 BX19D Millesime
- LHD, NA, AC, RP_5800
1996 XM 2.5TD Exclusive - x 73