I was wondering how we all think the BX stacks up against its successors in the Citroen range, 1991 ZX and 1993 Xantia. As I currently own both a ZX and a BX here's what I think:
BX
For
distintive styling
advanced engineering
smooth ride
height ajustment
self leveling
brakes
great seats
space
ergonomics
rust resistance
Against
less than brilliant build quality
below average paint quality
tinny feeling.
ZX
For
pleasing styling (aging quite well)
good build quality
rust resistance
reliability
handling
ride comfort (not far short of BX levels and less complex)
Against
no height ajustment
steering not as immnue to roadshock and sidewind.
BX vs its successors
-
- BXpert
- Posts: 216
- Joined: Fri May 20, 2005 7:36 pm
- Location: Abergavenny, South Wales.
BX vs its successors
2007 Sportka
-
- Over 2k
- Posts: 4408
- Joined: Sun Aug 14, 2005 10:53 pm
- x 5
-
- BXpert
- Posts: 216
- Joined: Fri May 20, 2005 7:36 pm
- Location: Abergavenny, South Wales.
-
- 1K Away
- Posts: 1604
- Joined: Wed May 18, 2005 6:23 pm
- Location: North Wales
I own a BX TZD, a ZX Volcane TD and look after for my family/friends a number of TD Xantias, here are my thoughts on the pros and cons
BX Distinctive style, comfortable interior, space, good performance , good handling, cons Tinny build, wind noise, electrical gremlins
ZX Great performance, great handling, excellent build quality and finish, superb parking visibility, cons still a few electrical gremlins.
Xantia, superb motorway wafter, quiet and refined, better panel fit than BX. Cons a bit heavier than the others which reflects in the handling and performance, still those electrics.
Stewart
BX Distinctive style, comfortable interior, space, good performance , good handling, cons Tinny build, wind noise, electrical gremlins
ZX Great performance, great handling, excellent build quality and finish, superb parking visibility, cons still a few electrical gremlins.
Xantia, superb motorway wafter, quiet and refined, better panel fit than BX. Cons a bit heavier than the others which reflects in the handling and performance, still those electrics.
Stewart
TZD 19 TD one of the few
Xantia Td estate, going soft
Xantia Td estate, going soft
-
- BXpert
- Posts: 216
- Joined: Fri May 20, 2005 7:36 pm
- Location: Abergavenny, South Wales.
-
- Citroen Sorceror
- Posts: 1266
- Joined: Fri May 20, 2005 8:51 pm
- Location: straddling the channel
- My Cars: 2003- Passe-Partout 1.9 TGD estate
2005 Grolliffe Tizzydee turbo estate and sundry other BXs and Grace, a CX TRD.
2008 to 2023 - all sorts of stuff, some interesting
2024. TxD 1.9D estate. 'Wheelybin' - x 12
-
- BXpert
- Posts: 216
- Joined: Fri May 20, 2005 7:36 pm
- Location: Abergavenny, South Wales.
-
- Over 2k
- Posts: 6425
- Joined: Sun Jul 03, 2005 9:36 pm
- Location: Fareham, Hants
- My Cars: Too many to list
- x 90
My BX 16v:
Good:
Performance
Sound of the engine
Comfort
Styling
"Sleeper" value
Very rare
Fairly easy to work on
Braking
Cruising
Bad:
Engine noise intrusion in cabin
Tinny feel inside
Ability to help you lose your licence
Compared with ZX 1.4 estate:
Good:
Spacious
Fantastic handling
Visability
Taught steering
Easy to work on
Driving position
Bad:
Fuel economy not good enough for such a weedy engine
Interior build
Ride isn't as great as I'd hoped
Gearchange
Awful braking on these basic models
Unreliable (this one at least)
Seating basic
With a mate's Xantia Activa thrown in:
Good:
THAT suspension
Leather seats the most comfy I've ever slumbered in!
Very quiet cabin
Good cruiser
Much more solid build than others
This particular one has over 220lbft of torque available
Did I mention the suspension?
Reliable (up to mentioning that, sorry Si )
Bad:
Fuel economy
Vague steering
"Will they won't they" brakes
Driving position not great
The drive amazes you rather than thrilling you.
BX the best overall I reckon. My ZX is a piece of crap, but I've driven a 16v version before and it feels like a different car! I imagine a TD Volcane would be similar. Activa will never stop impressing me around corners.
Good:
Performance
Sound of the engine
Comfort
Styling
"Sleeper" value
Very rare
Fairly easy to work on
Braking
Cruising
Bad:
Engine noise intrusion in cabin
Tinny feel inside
Ability to help you lose your licence
Compared with ZX 1.4 estate:
Good:
Spacious
Fantastic handling
Visability
Taught steering
Easy to work on
Driving position
Bad:
Fuel economy not good enough for such a weedy engine
Interior build
Ride isn't as great as I'd hoped
Gearchange
Awful braking on these basic models
Unreliable (this one at least)
Seating basic
With a mate's Xantia Activa thrown in:
Good:
THAT suspension
Leather seats the most comfy I've ever slumbered in!
Very quiet cabin
Good cruiser
Much more solid build than others
This particular one has over 220lbft of torque available
Did I mention the suspension?
Reliable (up to mentioning that, sorry Si )
Bad:
Fuel economy
Vague steering
"Will they won't they" brakes
Driving position not great
The drive amazes you rather than thrilling you.
BX the best overall I reckon. My ZX is a piece of crap, but I've driven a 16v version before and it feels like a different car! I imagine a TD Volcane would be similar. Activa will never stop impressing me around corners.
One third of a three-spoke BX columnist team for the Citroenian magazine.
CCC BX registrar: The national BX register - click to submit a car!
CCC BX registrar: The national BX register - click to submit a car!
-
- Over 2k
- Posts: 2112
- Joined: Fri Jul 01, 2005 2:58 am
- Location: Hampshire UK
Strangely I've never thought of my BX TD Estate as flimsy in any way. The ZX is very well made and really too heavy for its size. We have both - ZX is 1.9D and to be honest I much prefer the BX although the ZX is a very nice car.
We both find the ZX very clumsy with a far worse steering lock than the BX which can be embarrassing at times when trying to park what is after all not a very long car.
Driving - well ZX is nice and tight and even at 75,000 miles feels like new. I'll be honest - I find the BX much more comfortable! Must be something to do with the positionoing of the controls - my clutch foot never feels comfortable in the Zx so it could be the floor angle or something.
Cornering - ZX is amazing - its that self steering rear axle! - doesn't steer as well as BX but thats being niggly.
Ride - ZX is generally very good and copes with a load well. BX is better!
Ventilation - both heat well - BX needs the fan investigatijng but that's needed doing for the last 6 years and hasn't got any worse. Both have lousy fresh air vents - and are impossible to get any cool air through. Plenty of heat - but no fresh air.
Fuel consumption - nothing in it! Both really very good.
To be fair to the ZX we've had it 3 years now and must have done about 23,000 miles. Its been outstandingly reliable, very cheap to maintain and run and looks and goes as well or better than it did 3 years ago.
Jeremy
We both find the ZX very clumsy with a far worse steering lock than the BX which can be embarrassing at times when trying to park what is after all not a very long car.
Driving - well ZX is nice and tight and even at 75,000 miles feels like new. I'll be honest - I find the BX much more comfortable! Must be something to do with the positionoing of the controls - my clutch foot never feels comfortable in the Zx so it could be the floor angle or something.
Cornering - ZX is amazing - its that self steering rear axle! - doesn't steer as well as BX but thats being niggly.
Ride - ZX is generally very good and copes with a load well. BX is better!
Ventilation - both heat well - BX needs the fan investigatijng but that's needed doing for the last 6 years and hasn't got any worse. Both have lousy fresh air vents - and are impossible to get any cool air through. Plenty of heat - but no fresh air.
Fuel consumption - nothing in it! Both really very good.
To be fair to the ZX we've had it 3 years now and must have done about 23,000 miles. Its been outstandingly reliable, very cheap to maintain and run and looks and goes as well or better than it did 3 years ago.
Jeremy